<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ransomware virus that uses 1024-bit encryption key</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intology.com/computers-internet/ransomware-virus-that-uses-1024-bit-encryption-key/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intology.com/computers-internet/ransomware-virus-that-uses-1024-bit-encryption-key/</link>
	<description>Computers Technology Internet Arts Business Science Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:50:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.intology.com/computers-internet/ransomware-virus-that-uses-1024-bit-encryption-key/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intology.com/?p=325#comment-559</guid>
		<description>Not really. RSA is a public/private key algorithm which requires much longer encryption keys to be secure, 1024 bit minimum. You&#039;re thinking of a symmetric encryption algorithm, which 128 bit is the minimum considered secure.

Checkout Wikipedia for more info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really. RSA is a public/private key algorithm which requires much longer encryption keys to be secure, 1024 bit minimum. You&#8217;re thinking of a symmetric encryption algorithm, which 128 bit is the minimum considered secure.</p>
<p>Checkout Wikipedia for more info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yesimahuman</title>
		<link>http://www.intology.com/computers-internet/ransomware-virus-that-uses-1024-bit-encryption-key/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>yesimahuman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 03:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intology.com/?p=325#comment-558</guid>
		<description>&quot;If the encryption algorithm is implemented correctly, it could take one PC with a 2.2GHz processor around 30 years to crack a 660-bit key.&quot;

Hey RipVanDubbie...did you actually read the fucking article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If the encryption algorithm is implemented correctly, it could take one PC with a 2.2GHz processor around 30 years to crack a 660-bit key.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey RipVanDubbie&#8230;did you actually read the fucking article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RipVanDubbie</title>
		<link>http://www.intology.com/computers-internet/ransomware-virus-that-uses-1024-bit-encryption-key/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>RipVanDubbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 19:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intology.com/?p=325#comment-553</guid>
		<description>Wow, a 1024 bit encryption key? It would take a room full of super computers HUNDREDS (if not thousands) of years to crack a 256 bit encryption. Wow, thats impressive.

JT
www.FireMe.to/udi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a 1024 bit encryption key? It would take a room full of super computers HUNDREDS (if not thousands) of years to crack a 256 bit encryption. Wow, thats impressive.</p>
<p>JT<br />
<a href="http://www.FireMe.to/udi" rel="nofollow">http://www.FireMe.to/udi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
